An Ohio appeals court rejected a church's attempt to recover assets for an estate of which it was a beneficiary.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

© Copyright 1992, 1998 by Church Law & Tax Report. All rights reserved. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. Church Law & Tax Report, PO Box 1098, Matthews, NC 28106. Reference Code: m80 c0492

An Ohio appeals court rejected a church's attempt to recover assets for an estate of which it was a beneficiary. An individual (the "testator") executed a will on February 7, 1990, leaving all his bank accounts to a church. On March 5, 1990, the testator and a friend went to the testator's bank and, while there, the testator had all of his accounts and certificates of deposit placed in the joint names of himself and the friend as joint tenants with right of survivorship. The friend had not contributed to any of these funds and did not thereafter contribute anything to them. The testator died on August 29, 1990. On several occasions prior to the testator's death, the friend withdrew varying sums of money from the joint and survivorship funds totalling approximately $118,000. Within hours after the testator's death, the friend closed the last survivorship account by withdrawing the remaining balance. The church filed a complaint in the probate court alleging that the testator's friend was in possession of assets belonging to the testator's estate. The church asked the court to order the friend to return to the estate all monies he had taken from the testator's bank accounts and certificates of deposit. The probate court refused to grant the church's request. It found that there was clear and convincing evidence that the testator intended on March 5, 1990, to make his friend a co-owner of the accounts. The court found "particularly persuasive" the testimony of the branch manager at the bank on the issue of the intent of the testator on March 5, 1990, when the joint accounts were created." This decision was appealed by the church to a state appeals court, which affirmed the probate court's decision. St. James Episcopal Church v. Handorf, 1991 WL 261823 (Ohio App. 1991 unpublished).