RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Child Care
By Richard R.
Hammar,
J.D., LL.M., CPA
© Copyright 1990, 1998 by Church Law & Tax Report.
All rights reserved. This publication is designed to
provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the
subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that
the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or
other professional service. If legal advice or other expert
assistance is required, the services of a competent professional
person should be sought. Church Law & Tax Report, PO Box 1098,
Matthews, NC 28106. Reference Code: m11 m47 c0690
The Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that a
state law requiring a church-operated children's home to be
licensed by the state did not violate the church's constitutional
rights. A Baptist church opened a children's home, but did not
seek a license from the state. After receiving complaints about the
home, a state agency investigated and found numerous violations.
The state sought a court order prohibiting the continued operation
of the home, and the church responded by claiming that the state
licensing law violated the constitutional guaranty of religious
freedom. A trial court rejected the church's position, and ordered
the church to apply for a license. Rather than apply for a license,
the church appealed the trial court's order. The state supreme
court unanimously rejected the church's claim that the licensing
requirement violated its constitutional rights. It noted that "the
regulations governing child caring institutions are not used or
applied to direct, limit or regulate the religious content or
teachings of any child caring institution's program. The
requirement of licensure does not itself in any degree impair [the
church's] freedom to believe, express and exercise [its] religious
beliefs." Accordingly, the state licensing law did not impose an
impermissible burden on the church's constitutional rights. The
court also concluded that the licensing requirement did not violate
the constitutional right of parents to direct the education and
upbringing of their children. It observed that "there is not
indication that [the church] have legal custody of the children in
the home." Darrell Dorminey Children's Home v. Georgia
Department of Human Resources, 389 S.E.2d 211 (Ga. 1990).